Technical Bulletin: Tyndal Spring Triticale

 
 
Download 109K pdf file ("TechBulletin_Tyndal_FINAL.pdf")PDF
(109K)
     Subscribe to our free E-Newsletter, "Agri-News" (formerly RTW This Week)Agri-News
This Week
 
 
 
 Tyndal spring triticale was developed by the Field Crop Development Centre in Lacombe and was registered in 2006. Tyndal is marketed by SeCan.

Tyndal is an awnletted (reduced awn expression) standard height spring triticale line intended for use as a feed grain and conserved forage. Based on 27 station-years over a three-year period (Table 1) Tyndal yields higher than AC Certa (5%), slightly higher than Pronghorn (2%), and less than AC Ultima (-2%). During the last 2 years of the trial, Tyndal was 9% higher yielding than Pronghorn and 3% higher yielding than AC Ultima.

In 4 years of silage trials, Tyndal was higher yielding than Pronghorn by 4% and similar in silage yield to AC Ultima (Table 5).

End use
The high silage yield and reduced awn expression in Tyndal will diversify the use of spring triticale as a conserved forage (for silage and greenfeed/hay). Tyndal will also be directed to the expanding ethanol market in the prairies.

Agronomics and disease resistance
Tyndal is similar in maturity to the earliest checks and has a high test weight (Table 2). It carries the required resistance to disease (Table 3 and Table 4) including FHB.

Origin and breeding
Tyndal is derived from the cross between a germplasm line from CIMMYT Mexico and an awnletted triticale population developed at the Field Crop Development Centre. The awnletted characteristic in Tyndal comes from the same source as for the registered winter triticale Bobcat.

Tyndal was evaluated as 94L043017 in preliminary FCDC yield trials from 1998 to 2001 and as T182 in the Western Spring Triticale Coop Test from 2002 to 2004.

Strengths
Grain yield is similar to the highest yielding triticale check cultivar AC Ultima. Tyndal has good leaf and stem rust resistance, good test weight, early maturity, good lodging resistance and high forage yields. Tyndal has acceptable levels of disease resistance including FHB minimum requirements.

The reduced awn expression and good lodging resistance should diversify the utilization of spring triticale for forage (silage and green feed/hay) especially in high fertility and heavily manured production areas.

Weaknesses
Tyndal has a low falling number similar to other currently registered spring triticale varieties excluding AC Ultima.

Table 1. Summary of yield (kg ha-1) data from the Western Canadian Spring Triticale Cooperative Trial 2002-2004. Values in ( ) are expressed as a percentage of the check Pronghorn/T124.

Test Lines
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
3-year2003-2004
200220032004Mean200220032004Mean200220032004MeanMeanMean
Pronghorn29694360564043234825313744094124402147497026526543394553
(100)(100)(100)(100)(100)(100)(100)(100)(100)(100)(100)(100)(100)(100)
AC Certa30394760564244804366298843933916331231725466398341754433
(102)(109)(100)(104)(90)(95)(99)(95)(82)(67)(78)(76)(97)(98)
AC Ultima29604729652747385236313349364435333738055632425845504819
(107)(108)(116)(110)(114)(100)(111)(108)(83)(80)(80)(81)(106)(106)
Bunker23984641611443844448298948884108340948645526460042864718
(82)(107)(109)(99)(95)(95)(110)(100)(90)(102)(79)(90)(99)(104)
Tyndal24724762655345954384318751804250362045396076474544594963
(82)(109)(116)(102)(93)(102)(117)(104)(90)(96)(86)(91)(102)(109)
Stn Years
4
4
4
-
4
4
4
-
1
1
1
-
27
18
LSD
541
967
803
-
381
514
969
-
415
711
671
-
-
-

Table 2. Summary of agronomic and Falling Number data for the Western Canadian Spring Triticale Cooperative Trial, 2002-2004.
Test Lines
Hgt (cm)
Mat (days)
Lodge
Kg hL-1
Kwt (gm)
FaNo (sec)
Kernel KvD
Pronghorn
96
109
2.7
69.9
42.3
94
Triticale
AC Certa
97
109
2.2
74.3
42.0
88
Triticale
AC Ultima
92
106
2.4
71.4
44.6
145
Triticale
Bunker
101
107
2.4
72.5
45.7
74
Triticale
Tyndal
92
106
2.0
72.7
42.2
72
Triticale
Stn Years
25
20
7
27
27
26

Table 3. Summary of disease reaction for the Western Canadian Spring Triticale Cooperative Trial 2002-2004.
Test Lines
Leaf Rust
Stem Rust
Fusarium Head Blight
2002
2003
2004
2002
2003
2004
2002
2003
2004
Pronghorn (T124)
0/R/R
0R
0R
25MSS
3RMR/15S
5RMR
16R4MR
16/10MR
8MR
AC Certa (T128)
0/R/R
1/R
0R
7RMR
TrR/1R
TrR
48I/12I
48/29MS
9MR
AC Ultima (T150)
-
0R
0R
-
TrR/1R
TrR
-
49/34MS
56S
Bunker (T181)
0/R/R
0R
0R
5RMR
TrR/1R
TrR
36MR/9MR
25/27I
6R
Tyndal (T182)
0/R/R
0R
0R
3R
TrR/1R
TrR
51I/22MS
25/27I
22I
(Leaf rust in 2002 is severity/rating/pustule reaction. Stem rust data collected at Nolette/Winnipeg in 2003 and at Winnipeg in 2004. Fusarium head blight index data collected at Glenlea/Carman in 2002 and 2003 and at Carman in 2004.)

Table 4. Overall disease reaction for the Western Canadian Spring Triticale Cooperative Trial (2002-2004).
Test LinesBuntLeaf RustStem RustFHB
Pronghorn (T124)
R
R
I
MR
AC Certa (T128)
R
R
R
I
AC Ultima (T150)
R
R
R
S
Bunker (T181)
R
R
R
MR
Tyndal (T182)
R
R
R
MS

Table 5. Silage yield potential in FCDC tests at Lacombe AB (2001-2004). Harvest stage was early dough.
2001
2002
2003
2004
Test Lines
t ha-1
%
t ha-1
%
t ha-1
%
t ha-1
%
Mean
t ha-1
Mean %
Pronghorn
12.7
100
6.5
100
13.8
100
12.7
100
11.4
100
AC Ultima
12.5
98
7.6
117
14.2
103
12.2
96
11.6
104
Bunker (T181)
13.1
103
7.0
107
15.4
109
13.7
107
12.3
107
Tyndal (T182)
12.2
96
7.6
117
14.2
103
12.7
100
11.7
104

Other Field Crop Development Centre varieties
 
 
 
 
Share via AddThis.com
For more information about the content of this document, contact Lori Oatway.
This document is maintained by Erin Collier.
This information published to the web on July 27, 2006.
Last Reviewed/Revised on October 4, 2017.