|
Technical Bulletin: Bunker Spring Triticale | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Bunker spring triticale was developed by the Field Crop Development Centre in Lacombe and was registered in 2006. Bunker is available from FP Genetics.
Bunker is an awnletted (reduced awn expression) standard height spring triticale line intended for use as a feed grain and conserved forage. Based on 27 station-years of testing over a three-year period (Table 1) Bunker yields equivalent to Pronghorn (99%), higher than AC Certa (3%) and less than AC Ultima (-6%). During the last 2 years of the trial, Bunker was 4% higher yielding than Pronghorn and only 2% lower yielding than AC Ultima.
In 4 years of silage trials, Bunker was higher yielding than Pronghorn by 7% and AC Ultima by 3% (Table 5).
End use
The high silage yield and reduced awn expression in Bunker will diversify the use of spring triticale as a conserved forage (for silage and greenfeed/hay). Bunker will also be directed to the expanding ethanol market in the eastern prairies.
Agronomics and disease resistance
Bunker is similar in maturity to the earliest checks. It has a high test weight, and a large plump kernel (Table 2). It carries the required resistance (Table 3 and Table 4) to disease and has a level of resistance to FHB similar the most resistant cultivar (Pronghorn).
Origin and breeding
Bunker is derived from the cross between a germplasm line from CIMMYT, Mexico and an awnletted triticale line developed at the Field Crop Development Centre. The awnletted characteristic in Bunker comes from the same source as the winter triticale variety Bobcat.
Bunker was evaluated as 93L016002 in preliminary yield trials (from 1997-2001) and as T181 in the Western Spring Triticale Cooperative Test from 2002 to 2004.
Strengths
Bunker has resistance to FHB similar to the most resistant check variety (Pronghorn), early maturity similar to check cultivars AC Ultima and Pronghorn, good leaf and stem rust resistance and improved test mass.
Bunker also has higher silage yield than both AC Ultima and Pronghorn. The reduction in awn expression will diversify the use of spring triticale as a conserved forage (silage and greenfeed/hay).
Weaknesses
Bunker has a low falling number similar to other currently registered spring triticale varieties excluding AC Ultima.
Table 1. Summary of yield (kg ha-1) data from the Western Canadian Spring Triticale Cooperative trial 2002-2004. Values in ( ) are expressed as a percentage of the check Pronghorn.
.
Table 2. Summary of agronomic data and Falling Number for the Western Canadian Spring Triticale Cooperative Yield Trial 2002-2004.
Test Line | Hgt (cm) | Mat (days) | Lodge | Kg hL-1 | Kwt (gm) | FaNo (sec) | Kernel KvD |
Pronghorn | 96 | 109 | 2.7 | 69.9 | 42.3 | 94 | Triticale |
AC Certa | 97 | 109 | 2.2 | 74.3 | 42.0 | 88 | Triticale |
AC Ultima | 92 | 106 | 2.4 | 71.4 | 44.6 | 145 | Triticale |
Bunker | 101 | 107 | 2.4 | 72.5 | 45.7 | 74 | Triticale |
Tyndal | 92 | 106 | 2.0 | 72.7 | 42.2 | 72 | Triticale |
Stn Years | 25 | 20 | 7 | 27 | 27 | 26 | |
.
Table 3. Summary of disease reaction for the Western Canadian Spring Triticale Cooperative Trial 2002-2004.
Test Lines | Leaf Rust | Stem Rust | Fusarium Head Blight |
| 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 |
Pronghorn (T124) | 0/R/R | 0/R | 0/R | 25MSS | 3RMR/15S | 5RMR | 16R4MR | 16/10MR | 8MR |
AC Certa (T128) | 0/R/R | 1/R | 0/R | 7RMR | TrR/1R | TrR | 48I/12I | 48/29MS | 9MR |
AC Ultima (T150) | - | 0/R | 0/R | - | TrR/1R | TrR | - | 49/34MS | 56S |
Bunker (T181) | 0/R/R | 0/R | 0/R | 5RMR | TrR/1R | TrR | 36MR/9MR | 25/27I | 6R |
Tyndal (T182) | 0/R/R | 0/R | 0/R | 3R | TrR/1R | TrR | 51I/22MS | 25/27I | 22I |
(Leaf rust in 2002 is severity/rating/pustule reaction. Stem rust data collected at Nolette/Winnipeg in 2003 and at Winnipeg in 2004. Fusarium head blight index data collected at Glenlea/Carman in 2002 and 2003 and at Carman in 2004. All are resistant to common bunt.)
Table 4. Overall disease reaction for the Western Canadian Spring Triticale Cooperative Trial 2002-2004.
Test Lines | Bunt | Leaf Rust | Stem Rust | FHB |
Pronghorn (T124) | R | R | I | MR |
AC Certa (T128) | R | R | R | I |
AC Ultima (T150) | R | R | R | S |
Bunker (T181) | R | R | R | MR |
Tyndal (T182) | R | R | R | MS |
Table 5. Silage yield potential in FCDC tests at Lacombe, AB (2001-2004). Harvest stage was early dough.
Test Lines | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | | |
| t ha-1 | % | t ha-1 | % | t ha-1 | % | t ha-1 | % | Mean t ha-1 | Mean % |
Pronghorn | 12.7 | 100 | 6.5 | 100 | 13.8 | 100 | 12.7 | 100 | 11.4 | 100 |
AC Ultima | 12.5 | 98 | 7.6 | 117 | 14.2 | 103 | 12.2 | 96 | 11.6 | 104 |
Bunker | 13.1 | 103 | 7.0 | 107 | 15.4 | 109 | 13.7 | 107 | 12.3 | 107 |
Tyndal | 12.2 | 96 | 7.6 | 117 | 14.2 | 103 | 12.7 | 100 | 11.7 | 104 |
Other Field Crop Development Centre varieties
|
|
|
|
|
|
For more information about the content of this document, contact Lori Oatway.
This document is maintained by Erin Collier.
This information published to the web on July 27, 2006.
Last Reviewed/Revised on May 23, 2017.
|
|