Varieties of Cereal and Oilseed Crops for Alberta

 
 
Download 682K pdf file ("100-32.pdf")PDF
(682K)
     Subscribe to our free E-Newsletter, "Agri-News" (formerly RTW This Week)Agri-News
This Week
 
 
 
 Yield results and reporting | Maturity ratings | Seed size and plant populations | Plant Breeders’ Rights | Canola | Diseases, seed treatment and seed testing | Abbreviations and rating scales | Variety tables | Canola variety information | Other Variety Information

This annual publication provides information on cereal and oilseed variety performance in Alberta and northeastern British Columbia. Important agronomic characteristics and disease resistance information are provided for varieties of wheat, barley, oat, rye, triticale, flax and canola.

The Alberta Regional Variety Testing program for cereals and flax is coordinated by the Alberta Regional Variety Advisory Committee (ARVAC) and Alberta Agriculture and Forestry (AAF). Funding for the program is provided by the following:

  • Alberta Agriculture and Forestry
  • Alberta Wheat Commission
  • Alberta Barley Commission
  • Alberta Oat Growers Association
  • Alberta Seed Growers
  • Alberta Seed Processors
  • Entry fees for the varieties being tested
Data for this publication come from various sources:
  • Alberta Agriculture and Forestry
  • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
  • British Columbia Grain Producers
  • CPS Canada
  • University of Alberta
  • Alberta Innovates Technology Futures
  • Farming Smarter
  • Smoky Applied Research & Development Association (SARDA)
  • Battle River Research Group (BRRG)
  • Chinook Applied Research Association (CARA)
  • Gateway Research Organization (GRO)
  • Lakeland Applied Research Association (LARA)
  • McKenzie Applied Research Association (MARA)
  • Northern Peace Applied Research Association (NPARA)
  • Prairie Grain Development Committee
  • Canola Council of Canada
The following individuals are the Regional Variety Trial and crop specific co-ordinators:
  • Alex Fedko, Regional Variety Trial Co-ordinator
  • Spring wheat, Dr. H. Randhawa and Dr. D. Spaner
  • Winter Wheat, Dr. R. Graf
  • Barley, J. Anderson
  • Oat, Dr. J. Mitchell-Fetch
  • Triticale, Dr. H. Randhawa
  • Fall Rye, Dr. J. Larsen
  • Winter Triticale, Dr. J. Larsen
  • Flax, Dr. M. Beaith
Sincere thanks are extended to all individuals and organizations who contribute to this publication.

Yield results and reporting

Variety choice should never be based solely on yield performance, as it is only one factor that affects net return. The genetic yield potential of a variety is often masked by numerous factors, some of which can be controlled through variety choice and others through astute agronomic management.

Producers are encouraged to consider other characteristics such as maturity, plant height, lodging and disease/pest resistance when deciding which varieties to grow. Long term satisfaction with a variety is often related to non-yield characteristics.

Exercise caution when making yield comparisons among varieties. Variety yield should only be directly compared to the standard reference check. Actual head-to-head yield comparisons between other varieties may not have occurred.

Small plot agronomic trials are expensive to grow, and new varieties are registered every year. It is simply impractical to grow all varieties at the same time.

Following several years of data collection, the yield performance for a particular variety stabilizes relative to the check, and further testing is no longer required. It is for these reasons that the check varieties are grown every year (e.g. AC Barrie for CWRS wheat, AC Metcalfe for barley) and that changes to these checks are infrequent. The “Overall Station Years of Testing” column provides an indication of the unbalanced nature of the dataset.

At least six station-years of yield data collected over two years are required before reporting the figures in this publication. For new varieties, Overall Yield is often the first indication of yield potential relative to the check. As additional data become available, yield performance is also expressed on the basis of environmental productivity (Yield Test Categories of Low, Medium, High and Very High).

Yield rankings among varieties can change substantially due to growing conditions. To reflect these differences, results from a test site that produced high yield in a particular year are placed into the database for “high” yielding environments. The same site may contribute to the “low” yield category in a drought year, when yields are low.

Consistent performance over all Yield Test Categories indicates that a variety has environmental responses similar to the check and may have good yield stability over a wide range of environments.

Scientific studies conducted on variety performance in western Canada have shown that Yield Test Category analysis provides a more reliable indication of yield performance than results organized by geographic region.

The yield comparison tables have several features:
  • Overall actual yield of the check (bushels/acre) based on all data available to the testing program is provided along with the number of station years of testing.
  • The range in yield for each Yield Test Category is defined.
  • Actual yield of the check in each Yield Test Category is reported.
  • For varieties with sufficient data, the Overall Yield and performance in each Yield Test Category is expressed relative to the check.
  • Significant statistical differences relative to the check are indicated.
Yields that are statistically higher (+) or lower (-) than the check are indicated to aid in the selection process. No symbol after the yield figure indicates that there is no statistical difference from the check.

Pay particular attention to data on new varieties that have not been fully tested. If a large difference from the check is reported but is not significant, it could mean that yields have varied widely and/or there are not enough data to prove a statistical difference. With additional years of testing, the reported yield differences will become more accurate.

To make effective use of the yield comparison tables, producers should set a realistic yield target for the season and determine where it fits within the Low, Medium, High and Very High Yield Test Categories. This approach facilitates the matching of variety choice to expected productivity levels and is similar to that used when making decisions on other levels of inputs.

Please note that the actual yield levels indicated are from small plot trials, which may be 15 to 20 per cent higher than yields expected under commercial production.

Maturity ratings

As is the case for yield, growing conditions have a tremendous influence on the date of maturity. For example, a variety of CWRS wheat may mature in 98 days in Lethbridge, but take 103 days to mature in Edmonton. In the same way, a two-day difference in maturity between varieties in southern Alberta may amount to a five-day difference in a more northerly location.

To take this factor into account, maturity is expressed using a five-category scale: Very Early, Early, Medium, Late and Very Late. To aid producers with this relative scale, the average number of days to maturity for the check is reported. Note that this scale is different for each crop type. For example, an early barley variety will mature much earlier than an early flax variety.

Seed size and plant populations

Seed size within a crop kind will vary from variety to variety, requiring adjustment of seeding volumes to achieve desired plant populations. Some of the tables provide an average 1,000 kernel weight (TKW) that can be used as a guide for variety differences.

The best approach is to determine the 1,000 kernel weight of the seed to be planted, the germination rate, the emergence mortality and in the case of fall-seeded crops, an estimate of winterkill.

For more information and user-friendly seeding rate calculators that take into account these and other considerations, please see the web page.

Plant Breeders’ Rights

Plant Breeders’ Rights (PBR) are a form of intellectual property rights by which plant breeders can protect new varieties in the same way an inventor protects a new invention with a patent. In 2015, Canada amended the PBR Act to bring it into conformity with UPOV 91. Varieties protected under the previous legislation (UPOV 78) are indicated with the PBR UPOV78 logo logo, whereas those protected under the new legislation that are shown with a new PBR 91 logo logo. The use of the ▲ logo indicates that PBR is pending.

For more information on Plant Breeders' Rights, please visit the Plant Breeders’ Rights website,or the Canadian Food Inspection Agency website.

Canola

The Alberta Regional Variety Advisory Committee (ARVAC) does not take any responsibility for accuracy or validity of the canola performance data.

Diseases, seed treatment and seed testing
  • Disease ratings are compiled from various data sources in Alberta and other prairie provinces.
  • Treat rye and flax seed to control seedling blight; cereal seed for smuts and fusarium; canola seed to control flea beetle, seedling blight and the seed-borne phase of virulent blackleg.
  • Wheat with Moderately Susceptible (MS) or Susceptible (S) ratings for common bunt should be treated with a systemic fungicide as low levels of infection will restrict marketability.
  • Refer to labels for maximum storage periods of treated seed.
  • Treated seed must not be fed to livestock, poultry or wildlife and cannot be sold for feed.
  • Leaf spot ratings in the wheat tables are a combination of resistance to tan spot and septoria leaf disease complex.
  • Fusarium head blight (FHB), caused by Fusarium graminearum and other species, is an increasing problem in Alberta. The relative ranking of crops from most susceptible to least susceptible is durum wheat, common wheat, triticale, barley and oat. Corn is a host of F. graminearum and can serve as a source of infection when residue is left on the ground. FHB infection is highly influenced by the environment and heading date. A resistant (R) tolerance rating for FHB does not equate to immunity. Under severe epidemics, all varieties will sustain damage. All seed should be tested for the presence of FHB and treated with an appropriate seed treatment if required. Producers are advised to choose varieties with the best FHB tolerance whenever possible and always use best management practices to slow the spread of this disease.
  • Seed used in the Alberta Regional Variety Testing program comes with a “fusarium-free” certificate, and trials are inspected for FHB during the growing season.
Laboratories participating in the FHB testing program:
  • 20/20 Seed Labs Ltd., Nisku, AB: 1-877-420-2099
  • BioVision Seed Research Ltd., Edmonton, AB: 1-800-952-5407
  • BioVision Seed Research Ltd., Grande Prairie, AB: 1-877-532-8889
  • Parkland Laboratories, Red Deer, AB: 403-342-0404
  • Precision Seed Testing, Beaverlodge, AB: 780-354-2259
  • Seed Check Technologies Inc., Leduc, AB: 780-980-8324
Abbreviations and rating scales
  • TKW = Thousand kernel weight
  • XX = Insufficient data to describe
  • Maturity: VE = Very Early, E = Early, M = Medium, L = Late, VL = Very Late
  • Resistance Ratings: VP = Very Poor, P = Poor, F = Fair, G = Good, VG = Very Good, EX = Excellent
  • Disease Tolerance Ratings: R = Resistant, MR = Moderately Resistant, I = Intermediate, MS = Moderately Susceptible, S = Susceptible
  • Kernel Type (winter wheat): HR = Hard Red, SR = Soft Red, HW = Hard White, SW = Soft White
  • Awns (wheat): Y = Yes (bearded), N = No (awnless)
  • Awn Type (barley): R = Rough, S = Smooth, SS = Semi-smooth
  • Seed Size (flax): S = Small, M = Medium, L = Large
Variety tables

Crops
Spring wheat
Barley
Oat
Winter wheat
Fall rye
Flax
Canola

Canola Variety Information

The variety description tables summarize the performance of limited canola varieties tested in 2016 through the post-registration Canola Performance Trial (CPT).

The data was audited by field inspection and a data review process by a joint committee of government and industry. The data presented was collected from small plot trials (13 successful in 2016) following scientific protocols to ensure comparisons are unbiased.

Detailed notes on other variety attributes, trial management and variety comparisons at individual locations or across multiple years and locations can be found at the website: Canola Performance Trials.

The most reliable performance indicator is a comparison over multiple sites and years. The trial design included grouping varieties by herbicide tolerance (HT), so the LSD (Least Significant Differences) has been included for each group to help determine if yield difference are significant.

Large scale (51 successful) trials with limited variety comparisons were conducted with protocols and selected audits for proper comparisons, data collection and scrutiny. Paired “t-test” statistics were used to identify significant yield differences from the check (5% level).

Disease ratings for canola

The column indicating “Disease Tolerance” is for Blackleg, Clubroot or Sclerotinia.

All tested varieties have the resistant (R) rating that strongly suppresses blackleg but can still develop lesions or cankers at certain locations and years. Better blackleg control is achieved through the use of resistant varieties and by using a 1 in 4 year canola rotation.

Varieties with clubroot resistance
  • Bayer CropScience: L135 C, L241C
  • Brett Young: 6056CR, 6076CR, 6086CR
  • CANTERRA Seeds: CS2000
  • Cargill: V12-3
  • Crop Production Services: PV 580 GC, PV 581 GC, PV 590 GCS, VR 9562 GC
  • Dow AgroSciences: 1020 RR, 2020 CL
  • Monsanto/DeKalb:74-54 RR
  • Pioneer Hi-Bred/DuPont: 45H29, 45H33, D3155C, 45CS40
  • Syngenta: SY4105, SY 4187
For further information and variety tables, download Agri-Facts: Varieties of Cereal and Oilseed Crops for Alberta (Agdex 100-32) 1360K PDF.

Other Variety Information

For additional information, including varieties not listed in this publication, please call the Alberta Ag-Info Centre toll-free at 310-FARM (3276), or check the Alberta Agriculture and Forestry website.

Factsheet information and tables prepared, reviewed and approved by:
Alberta Regional Variety Advisory Committee (ARVAC) (formerly the Alberta British Columbia Grain Advisory Committee – ABCGAC)

Data preparation and factsheet co-ordination by:
Alex Fedko
Co-ordinator RVT/Crop Research Technologist
Alberta Agriculture and Forestry

Source: Agdex 100/32. January 2017.
 
 
 
 
Share via AddThis.com
For more information about the content of this document, contact Duke.
This information published to the web on February 1, 2004.
Last Reviewed/Revised on February 13, 2017.