Biogas (Methane) Overview

 
 
Download 411K pdf file ("Biogas_Overview.pdf")PDF
(411K)
     Subscribe to our free E-Newsletter, "Agri-News" (formerly RTW This Week)Agri-News
This Week
 
 
 
 What is biogas | Benefits of biogas | Challenges of biogas | Current technologies and investment | Websites for biogas information

What is Biogas?

Biogas is "renewable natural gas" containing approximately 70% methane (CH4) and roughly 30% carbon dioxide and trace amounts of other gases.

Potential agricultural feedstocks for biogas production include manure (hog, dairy, beef and poultry), food processing (byproducts of meat processing, potato, dairy, cheese whey, sugar beet, pea hulls, and vegetables); and energy crops cut as silage (wheat, barley, triticale, clover, alfalfa, ryegrass, turnips and corn).

Benefits of Biogas

Methane yields from agriculture feedstocks are in the 50% to 70% range. Manure has the lowest yield with energy crops and food processing having the highest yields. Much potential exists to blend feedstocks to achieve desirable methane yields and solve environmental issues at the same time.

Commercial products from biogas production include methane, electricity, heat, steam, fertilizer, chemical recovery, odor reduction, water recycling, CO2 and potentially carbon credits and greenhouse gas credits.

Challenges of Biogas

Deciding to market the electricity, renewable natural gas directly, or combined heat and power depends on the location of the end users and the cost of meeting market standards:

  • The capital cost of linking to the electricity grid (cogeneration units, metering etc.) varies from $60,000 to $350,000, depending on the scale of the project;
  • Upgrading the biogas to meet the gas quality requirements of low pressure natural gas gathering pipelines will require capital costs in the range of $4 to $5 Million per MW of output to remove the CO2; finding opportunities to use existing fossil-fuel based upgrading systems for other types of natural gas sources will greatly reduce these costs;
  • Using the heat and power on site or at nearby facilities, be they agricultural or other types of operations, is cost effective; excess power/gas/heat can be sold on the market;
  • new generation cooperatives who seek to collaborate on the infrastructure and/or processing costs of biogas and other types of bioenergy installations (integrated ethanol-feedlot-biodiesel and processing facilities) could enhance the economies of scale.
Current Technologies & Investment

Anaerobic biodigestors can be either wet fermentation or dry fermentation. Wet biodigestors must be cleaned out every 1 to 3 years with a life expectance of the digestor being approximately 10 years. Dry biodigestors do not have to be cleaned out as often and have a life expectance of approximately 20 years.

Capital cost for a biogas facility that produces one (1) megawatt of power would be in the $4 to $6 Million range depending on the level of infrastructure at the site. Liquid systems that are already set up for collection and handling, may require intermediary processing and holding before entering the digester. Solid systems will have to develop the infrastructure to increase manure collecting and handling to feed the digester - manure collection frequency will have to increase to at least 4 times a year to feed the digester with relatively 'fresh' material.

The availability of turnkey technology, expected to develop in the future, will help reduce the costs. Biogas facilities, at this juncture, can expect the following capital and installation costs for a 1 MW unit1 to be:
  • Manure Collection and System Processing - $100,000 to $600,000 range (June 2006 pricing)
  • Digestion System - $300,000 to $500,000 range
  • Solid-Liquid Separation of Digestate - $200,000 to $300,000 range depending on need for secondary storage (nutrient recovery/water recycling not included)
  • Biogas Utilization - $3 to $3.5 Million for hydrogen sulphide scrubbing systems, cogeneration units, metering, grid connection, and flare system (add on an additional $1 M for CO2 removal if gas is preferred over electricity marketing);
  • Post-Digestion System (secondary storage of digestate with further biogas collection), without solid-liquid separation) - $200,000 to $400,000.
To realize a 100 kW to 5MW size biogas facility, running on manure only, the following sizes of confined feeding operations would be needed2:

Size of Operation
(MWe)
0.1
0.3
0.5
1.5
5
Animal Requirement
(head)
Beef Feeder
2,186
6,558
10,930
32,791
109,302
Beef Finisher
1,053
3,158
5,263
15,790
52,633
Dairy Cows
421
1,264
2,107
3,322
21,072
Hog Farrow to Finisher
3,445
10,336
17,226
51,678
172,261
Hog Farrow to Wean
364
1,091
1,818
5,453
18,176
Layers
9,541
28,624
47,707
143,120
477,066
Broilers
37,431
112,294
187,157
561,470
1,871,568

To ensure a consistent supply of renewable natural gas/electricity, to the electrical grid or natural gas pipelines, a recommended number of biodigestor units at each site would be two to three.

Project developers should factor in the cost for engineering designs for biogas facilities to be between 10 and 15% of the total cost of the project.

Project developers need to go through two avenues to develop projects:
  1. Application to "Alberta Environment" for an environmental approval, which will deal with transportation of waste to the facility and any air/water emissions from the projects. Steps to follow are:
    1. Applicant must contact the Approvals Manager in the region they want to build the plant in. These contacts are on Alberta Environment's website: http://environment.alberta.ca/
    2. Fill out an approvals application describing the process, inputs/outputs, and other information as required
    3. A public posting is part of the process - statements of concern may arise. If no statement of concern, then go to point e.
    4. Statements of Concern may trigger an Environmental Appeals Board hearing.
    5. Once the public posting/Appeals Board issues are dealt with the approvals writer will take all of the information and make a recommendation to the Approvals Director in the region. An approval is granted if all is in order.
    6. Process may take 3 months if no public concerns, or 6 months to a year if appeals need to be dealt with.
  2. Application to the Energy and Utilities Board for a Power Plant approval, if the facility is generating over 1 MW. A similar process occurs at this level.
The government of Alberta is working collaboratively to raise the 1 MW threshold to 5 MW before the more comprehensive environmental or EUB approval is triggered.

Potential Research and Development funds for new projects (Precommercial, Demo) could possibly be obtained from the "Alberta Funding Consortium" (Government of Alberta) or from Government of Canada research and development funds. Projects that are funded would have to be for new ideas only.

1 Note - this is for a 1 MW output of electricity; based on June 2006 pricing - all figures are subject to change.
2 If manure is to be mixed with other feedstocks, the methane yield can be boosted substantially, lowering the animal number threshold. Analysis by a qualified lab can determine the appropriate blends of feedstocks.

Websites for Biogas Information

Alberta Environment - Planning and Siting
http://environment.alberta.ca/

Alberta Research Council
http://www.arc.ab.ca

Apporro Zeolit Technologies Inc., Calgary (Norm Smith
email: nsmigh.apporro@shaw.ca

CEL Projects, Calgary
http://www.celprojects.com

Climate Change Central - 2006 "Alberta Biogas Conference"
http://www.climatechangecentral.com

ECB Enviro North America, Fort Macleod
http://www.ecbna.com

Genesis Projects Corporation, Calgary
email: genesisprojects@shaw.ca

GenSolutions Ltd., Edmonton
http://gensolutions.ab.ca/

Government of Alberta
http://www.gov.ab.ca/home/index.cfm

Highmark Renewables, Vegreville - IMUS technology
http://www.highmark.ca

Olds College, Methane Testing, Olds
http://www.oldscollege.ca

Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA) Energy Website
http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/energy.html

RCM Digester, Berkeley, California
http://www.rcmdigesters.com

Sustainable Energy Group Inc., Stony Plain
http://www.enermac.com/SEGI.htm

Waterous Power Systems, Calgary
http://www.waterouspower.com

Contributors to this document include:
Jim A. Jones, Karen Haugen-Kozyra, Mahendran Navaratnasamy, Brian Koberstein, Xiaomei Li, Alberta Research Council, Patti Breland

Disclaimer: "The information contained in this document is for discussion purposes only. Financial parameters and forecasts should not be construed as statements of fact as they depend on the occurrence of future events that cannot be assured. The actual financial results of a business operation may vary from the attached forecasts and assumption factors."
 
 
 
 
Share via AddThis.com
For more information about the content of this document, contact Victor Cheng.
This document is maintained by Patti Breland.
This information published to the web on December 19, 2006.
Last Reviewed/Revised on September 26, 2008.