Results from the Second Year of the Lakeland Project

 
 
Subscribe to our free E-Newsletter, "RTW This Week"Sign up for our
E-Newsletter
 
 
 
 Methods | Growth traits | Carcass grade traits | Retail cuts | Discussion and conclusion

.By Cathy Gallivan, Susan Hosford, Tracy Hagedorn, Wade Meunier, Sunterra Meats, Mel Mathison, Lakeland College

Editor’s Note: The Lakeland Carcass Sire Project is a three-year project scheduled for completion March 2009. The results presented below are preliminary results from the second year of the project only; final conclusions about the terminal sire breeds used in the study will only be available at the end of the project.

The objective of this project is to compare the ability of five terminal sire breeds of sheep used in western Canada (Suffolk, Charollais, Canadian Arcott, Texel and Ile de France) to sire lambs that grow quickly and produce lean carcasses with a high yield of wholesale cuts.

In each year of the project, rams of these five breeds were mated to ewes in the Lakeland College commercial ewe flock. Lambs were born, weaned and fed to market weight at the college. From there they were transported to Sunterra Meats in Innisfail for slaughter, grading and processing into wholesale cuts.

Methods

As a result of a serious outbreak of sheep footrot in the college ewe flock in the winter and spring of 2006, the entire flock of mixed Suffolk, Dorset, Romanov and Rideau Arcott ewes was culled during the summer of 2006. The flock wasreplaced with a group of mature commercial white-faced range ewes of Rambouillet and Columbia breeding. Beginning on August 29, 2006, these new ewes were single-sire mated to 26 rams (representing the five terminal sire breeds in the study) from Alberta, Saskatchewan and Ontario. Every effort was made to acquire rams that were as unrelated as possible.

Lambs were reared from birth until slaughter on the college farm facility. After a period of approximately 48-72 hours in a claiming pen, ewes and lambs were removed to one of three large pens, where the lambs remained until they were shipped to slaughter. Male lambs were castrated in their first 48-72 hours. All lambs were identified with double RF ID tags (Allflex).

Lambs were weaned when the youngest lamb in the pen was 56 days old. Ewes were removed to another facility. The lambs were left in the pens, with they were already accustomed to.

From one week of age until slaughter, lambs had ad libitum access to a total mixed ration pellet (16% CP) and long-stem grass hay. Lambs were weighed at weaning and every two weeks thereafter.

Lambs were killed on six slaughter dates from June 18, 2007 to September 11, 2007. Live weights were taken two hours before transportation to Sunterra Meats, a journey of approximately four hours. At the processing plant, lambs were penned overnight with access to water and killed the next day, approximately 10 hours after arrival at the plant.

All of the carcasses in this project were graded by the same experienced grader. The GR measurement was taken at the 12th rib and a visual assessment for muscling at the leg, loin and shoulder was made. Carcasses were chilled overnight (about 15 hours) and processed the next morning.

From the cooler, each carcass was weighed on a cold weight scale, then cut and divided into three primal cuts: the shoulder, middle (rack and loin) and leg of the lamb. The leg was then further processed into a tunnel-boned leg, the middle into a rack, short loin and Alta rib, and the shoulder into a shank and a flat pack boneless shoulder. Each of these cuts were trimmed as required for sale, and the weights of each recorded. Excess fat was discarded until the ratio of lean to fat in the trim from each lamb was 70:30, and the weight of the trim weighed for each lamb.

Two hundred and sixty-three lambs born in 2007 were available for analysis. The lambs were sired by terminal sires of the Canadian Arcott (58), Charollais (41), Ile de France (64), Suffolk (53) and Texel (47) breeds. The majority of lambs were raised as twins (153) or singles (69), with 41 lambs reared artificially.

The MIXED procedure of SAS was used in the analysis. The model for all traits contained the fixed effects of sire breed, sex of lamb, type of rearing, and the pen the lamb was reared in. The sire of the lamb (within sire breed) was included as a random effect.

Weaning weight and hot and cold slaughter weights were adjusted to a common age of the lamb by the inclusion of lamb age as a covariate in the models for these traits.

Lambs were sent to slaughter on the first weigh date when their live weight exceeded 108 lb., in order to ensure a hot carcass weight of less than 60 lb., because of severe price penalties for carcasses over that weight. The postweaning growth rate of the lambs was therefore evaluated as the age at which a lamb was sent to slaughter. This trait was adjusted for the lamb’s actual slaughter weight by the inclusion of slaughter weight in the model as a covariate.

Carcass traits were adjusted to a common hot carcass weight by the inclusion of the hot carcass weight as a covariate in the models for these traits

Growth Traits

Least-squares means of weaning weight and age at slaughter are shown in Table 1. The average lamb born in 2007 was weaned at 47 days of age weighing 17.4 kg.

Breed of sire was a significant (P=.01) source of variation in weaning weight adjusted to a common weaning age. Lambs sired by Charollais and Suffolk rams were heavier at weaning than lambs sired by Ile de France or Texel rams. Canadian-Arcott sired lambs were intermediate between the two heavier and lighter breeds. Male and female lambs had weaning weights that were similar to each other. Weaning weight was significantly (P<.0001) affected by type of rearing. Lambs reared as singles, twins or artificially had weaning weights of 19.9 kg, 17.6 kg and 13.6 kg, respectively.

The average lamb born in 2007 was slaughtered at 139 days at a weight of 53.1 kg.

Breed of sire was a highly significant (P<.0001) source of variation for age at a common slaughter weight. Lambs sired by Texel rams reached slaughter weight later than lambs sired by any of the other four breeds. Ile de France-sired lambs reached slaughter weight later than lambs sired by Suffolk or Charollais rams. Male lambs went to slaughter 8.5 days earlier (P<.0001) than female lambs.

Type of rearing was also a significant (P<.01) source of variation; lambs reared as singles were slaughtered 5.6 days earlier than lambs reared as twins, which were slaughtered 13.4 days earlier than artificially-reared lambs.

Table 1. Least-squares means of weaning weights and ages at slaughter of lambs sired by five terminal sire breeds

Breed
Age at Slaughter 2 (days)
Weaning Weight 1 (kg)
Canadian Arcott
136.7a,b
16.9a,b
Charollais
133.4a
18.1a
Ile de France
144.1b
16.3b
Suffolk
131.4a
17.9a
Texel
159.8c
16.1b
1 Adjusted to a common weaning age
2 Adjusted to a common slaughter weight
abcMeans with different superscripts are significantly different (P<.05)

Carcass Grade Traits

Least-squares means for traits included in the determination of carcass grade for lambs are presented in Table 2. Hot and cold carcass weights were adjusted to a common age at slaughter, while the GR measurement and all the conformation traits were adjusted to a common hot carcass weight.

The average hot and cold carcass weights of all lambs were 24.1 kg and 23.6 kg.

There were no significant differences between the five terminal sire breeds for either hot or cold carcass weight. Both hot and cold carcass weights of males were similar to those of females. Lambs reared as singles did not differ from lambs reared as twins for either hot or cold carcass weight, but lambs reared artificially had hot carcass weights that were 1.1 kg and 0.9 kg less (P<.05) than those of single or twin lambs, respectively. The same differences between artificially-reared versus single or twin lambs were observed for cold carcass weight.

Breed of sire was a significant (P<.0001) source of variation for the carcass GR measurement. Lambs sired by Suffolk or Charollais rams had lower GR values than lambs sired by Ile de France, Canadian Arcott or Texel rams. There were no significant differences in the GR measurements of male versus female or single- versus twin- versus artificially-reared lambs.

There were few significant breed of sire differences for either leg or loin conformation scores. Ile de France-sired lambs had leg conformation scores that were superior (P=.02) to those of Canadian Arcott-sired lambs, and loin conformation scores that were superior (P=.02) to those of Suffolk-sired lambs.

Texel-, Charollais- and Ile de France-sired lambs had significantly (P<.05) higher shoulder conformation scores than Suffolk-sired lambs. When leg, loin and shoulder conformation scores were averaged and rounded off to the nearest whole number, the conformation score of lambs sired by Ile de France or Texel rams was significantly (P<.05) higher than that of lambs sired by Suffolk rams.

There were no differences between male and female lambs for any conformation scores. Lambs reared as singles (3.2 kg) had higher (P=.02) leg conformation scores than lambs reared as twins (3.1 kg).

Table 2. Least-squares means of carcass grade traits of lambs sired by five terminal sire breeds
Carcass Conformation
Breed
Hot weight1 (kg)
Cold weight1

(kg)

GR (mm) 2
Leg2
Loin2
Shoulder2
Average2
Canadian Arcott

23.9a

23.3a
19.3b
3.1b
3.1a,b
3.0ab
3.1a,b
Charollais
24.5a
24.0a
17.2a
3.3a,b
3.1a,b
3.1a
3.1a,b
Ile de France
24.3a
23.7a
18.9b
3.3a
3.2a
3.0a
3.2a
Suffolk
23.9a
23.4a
16.5a
3.1a,b
3.0b
2.7b
3.0b
Texel
23.9a
23.4a
19.3b
3.3a,b
3.2a,b
3.2a
3.2a
1Adjusted to a common age at slaughter
2 Adjusted to a common hot carcass weight
abcMeans with different superscripts are significantly different (P<.05)

Retail Cuts

Least-squares means of the weights of the wholesale cuts from each of the five breed groups of lambs are presented in Table 3. Weights of wholesale cuts were adjusted to a common hot carcass weight during the analysis.

Lambs sired by Suffolk, Ile de France or Texel rams yielded significantly (P<.05) heavier weights of tunnel-boned leg than did lambs sired by Canadian Arcott rams. The tunnel-boned legs of female lambs (4.58 kg) were heavier (P=.01) than those of male lambs (4.44 kg).

Lambs sired by Canadian Arcott rams had racks that were significantly (P=.03) heavier than those of lambs sired by Suffolk rams. There were no differences between male versus female lambs for the weight of the rack.

Suffolk, Charollais and Canadian Arcott rams all sired lambs with heavier (P<.01) short loins than did Texel rams. There were no differences between male versus female lambs for the weight of the short loin.

Texel-sired lambs had heavier flat pack shoulders than lambs sired by any of the four other breeds. The shoulders of Charollais-sired lambs were heavier than those of Suffolk or Canadian Arcott-sired lambs. Male lambs (3.19 kg) had heavier (P=.04) shoulders than did female lambs (3.13 kg).

Canadian Arcott-sired lambs had heavier (P<.05) Alta Rib weights than lambs sired by Suffolk, Charollais or Ile de France rams. Texel-sired lambs also had heavier (P=.02) Alta Rib weights than Ile de France-sired lambs. Female lambs (1.28 kg) had heavier (P=.04) Alta Rib weights than did male lambs (1.23 kg).

Suffolk-sired lambs had higher (P<.05) shank weights than lambs sired by the other four breeds, which were similar to one another. Male lambs (.77 kg) had heavier (P<.01) shank weights than did female lambs (.74 kg).

The weight of 70:30 lean:fat trim from each lamb was greater for lambs sired by Canadian Arcott and Charollais rams than for Suffolk and Texel rams. There were no differences between male versus female lambs for 70:30 trim weight.

Table 3. Least-squares means of weights of wholesale cuts from lambs sired by five terminal sire breeds1
Breed
Tunnel-boned Leg (kg)
Rack (kg)
Short

Loin (kg)

Flat Pack

Shoulder (kg)

Alta rib (kg)
Shank (kg)
Trim

(kg)

Canadian Arcott
4.33b
1.59a
1.90a
3.05c
1.33a
.75b
3.26a
Charollais
4.50a,b
1.55a,b
1.90a
3.20b
1.22b,c
.74b
3.27a
Ile de France
4.58a
1.57a,b
1.87a,b
3.11b,c
1.20b
.74b
3.18a,b
Suffolk
4.59a
1.53b
1.92a
3.07c
1.25b,c
.78a
3.07b
Texel
4.55a
1.55a,b
1.81b
3.36a
1.28a,c
.75b
3.16a,b
1Weights of wholesale cuts adjusted to a common hot carcass weight
abcMeans with different superscripts are significantly different (P<.05)

Discussion and Conclusion

The ranking of sire breeds for weaning weight and age at slaughter are in agreement with the expectation that larger breeds, such as the Suffolk and Charollais, will grow faster up to slaughter weight. Larger breeds that grow faster are also expected to be leaner at a given slaughter weight and the lower carcass GR measurements of the Suffolk- and Charollais-sired lambs are consistent with this expectation.

In contrast to the growth traits, lambs sired by the smaller breeds of rams (Ile de France and Texel) outperformed the larger breeds for all of the carcass conformation scores.

It is difficult to choose a clear winner for the weight of trimmed wholesale cuts. The Canadian Arcott-sired lambs had the best result for the rack and the worst result for the tunnel-boned leg. The Texel-sired lambs had the best result for the shoulder and the worst result for the short loin. The Suffolk, Ile de France and Charollais were tied for the heaviest tunnel-boned leg. Some of the results in Table 3 are consistent with those from the lambs born in 2006 to the previous crossbred ewe flock (see RTW website link and Sheep Canada Summer 2007) but others are not.

Lambs from the third year of this project are on the ground now at Lakeland College. They will be grown out and shipped for slaughter according to the same protocol described for lambs in year two. Data from all three years will be combined at the end of 2008 and final conclusions from the project will be drawn at that time.

Acknowledgments:
Sunterra Meats, Innisfail, AB
Lakeland College, Vermilion, AB
Diversified Livestock Fund of Alberta
Ag&Food Council, ACAAF Fund
Alberta Agriculture & Rural Development
Alberta Sheep & Wool Commission
Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture
Saskatchewan Sheep Development Board
 
 
 
 
For more information about the content of this document, contact Susan Hosford.
This document is maintained by Tracy Hagedorn.
This information published to the web on March 20, 2008.