Diamondback Moth

 
 
Download 1580K mobile version ("622-19-Diamonback-moth.epub")mobile version
(1580K)
     Download 99K pdf file ("622-19.pdf")PDF
(99K)
     Subscribe to our free E-Newsletter, "Agri-News" (formerly RTW This Week)Agri-News
This Week
 
 
 
 Background | Life cycle | Host plants and damage | Monitoring | Economic thresholds | Control | Best management practices

Diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.), was introduced to North America from Europe about 150 years ago. The insect now occurs throughout North America, wherever its host plants are grown.

Diamondback moth larvae feed on all plants in the Brassicaceae family, and in Alberta, canola and mustard are its primary targets.

Background

Diamondback moth adults may overwinter in the prairies, but most infestations occur when adult moths arrive on wind currents in the spring from the southern or western United States or northern Mexico.

Although the diamondback moth occurs each year throughout the Canadian prairies and north central United States, the severity of the infestation varies considerably from year to year depending on the arrival time and population size of spring migrants. In some years, the pest has caused many millions of dollars in lost revenue.

Life Cycle

The diamondback moth takes about 32 days to develop from egg to adult, but this timing can vary from 21 to
51 days depending on the environment and available food sources. Diamondback moth can have up to four generations per year on the prairies. Generations usually overlap, and all four life stages (egg, larva, pupa and adult) may be present in the field at the same time.

Early arrival combined with favourable environmental conditions can produce a larger population buildup and result in greater crop damage.

Adults
The adult moth is approximately 8 to 9 mm long with a wing span of 12 to 15 mm. At rest, the moth folds its wings over the abdomen in a tent-like manner. The folded wings flare upwards and outward at the tips. The wing tips are fringed with long hairs. Moths will flutter up out of the canopy when the canopy is disturbed.
The forewing margins have a series of yellow wavy markings. When the wings are folded while the moth is at rest, these markings come together to form three yellow diamonds, hence the name “diamondback.”

Adult females lay an average of 160 eggs during their life span of about 16 days. Egg-laying occurs at night. The greatest number of eggs are laid the first night after emergence, and egg-laying continues for about 10 days.
Most canola crops will not have emerged when the migrant diamondback moth adults arrive from the United States. These adults will lay eggs on cruciferous weeds and volunteer canola.

Eggs
Eggs are oval, yellowish-white and tiny. They are glued to upper and lower leaf surfaces singly or in groups of two or three, usually along the veins or where the leaf surface is uneven. The eggs hatch in four to eight days.

Larvae
Immediately after hatching from the egg, first-instar larvae burrow into the leaf and begin mining the leaf tissue internally. The three subsequent larval instars feed on the surface of leaves, buds, flowers and pods. Each instar has a duration of approximately 4 days, but the larval stage can range from 10 to 21 days depending upon temperature and the availability of food.

The larvae are pale yellowish-green to green caterpillars covered with fine, scattered, erect hairs. The posterior end of the caterpillar is forked. At maturity, the larvae are cigar-shaped and about 12 mm long.

The diamondback moth larva is easily identified by its peculiar reaction to being disturbed. It will wriggle backward violently and may drop from the plant, suspended by a silken thread. After several seconds, the larva will climb back onto the leaf and continue feeding.

Pupae
Larvae pupate in delicate, white, open-mesh cocoons attached to the leaves, stems or seed pods of the host plant. Initially, the pupae are light green, but as they mature, they become brown as the adult moth becomes visible through the cocoon. The pupal stage lasts from 5 to 15 days, depending on environmental conditions.

Host Plants and Damage

Host plants of diamondback moth include all plants in the Brassicacea family. This group includes canola, mustard and the vegetable cole crops such as broccoli, cabbage, cauliflower and kale.

Crop damage is caused by the larval stage. Diamondback moth larvae feed on any green tissue of canola and mustard plants but prefer leaves. The amount of damage varies greatly, depending on plant growth stage, larval density and larval size.

Diamondback moth larvae have caused crop damage as early as the first true-leaf stage of the crop. This situation was seen in some areas in the 2012 crop year when diamondback moth adults arrived early. However, most crop damage occurs later in the growing season.

An arrival time of moths in mid-May can enable the species to complete three or four generations by the time crops are in the pod development stages and most vulnerable to attack.

Larval feeding damage to canola leaves is usually considered to have a minor effect on yield, but larval feeding on buds and flowers can be more damaging, especially when plants are under abiotic stress (e.g., drought) and cannot compensate by producing new buds and flowers.

In the pod stages, when leaves dry up, larvae move to stems and pods, where they remove surface tissue. The seeds within a damaged pod will not fill completely, and pods may shatter, resulting in yield loss. Larvae may also chew into pods and eat the developing seeds. In prairie fields under severe attack by diamondback moth, yield losses can be extreme.

Monitoring

Overwintering diamondback moths were found in central Alberta in the early 1990s. Adults have also recently been found in spring emergence traps in Saskatchewan and have been collected very early in spring in Manitoba. However, the numbers of these early specimens is low, and it is likely that very few diamondback moths survive prairie winters.

A wind trajectory modelling project is now implemented annually during the growing season and integrates a network of sentinel sites with pheromone traps. To assess the population, a network of 27 monitoring sites has been established across Alberta. This network is meant to act as part of an early warning system for diamondback moth and should be used in conjunction with crop scouting.

These traps can sometimes predict the potential for crop damage, and trap counts can provide an early warning of a possible infestation. Environmental conditions will determine how many eggs are laid and whether the larvae emerge and survive.

The diamondback moth forecast map can be found at Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development’s Alberta Insect Pest Monitoring Network website at: http://agriculture.alberta.ca/bugs-pest

Larvae
Producers should sample diamondback moth larvae by removing the plants in an area measuring one-tenth of a square metre area (about 1 square foot), beating the plants on a clean surface and then counting the number of larvae dislodged from the plants. Repeat this procedure in at least five locations in the field to obtain an average count. Crops should be sampled at least twice a week during the growing season.

Economic Thresholds

When to take action
A nominal threshold of 25 to 33 per cent defoliation, with larvae still present on plants, can be applied for canola at seedling stage.

The nominal threshold when control is required in canola is if larvae exceed 100 to 150 per square metre (1 - 2 larvae/plant) in immature to flowering plants and 200 to 300 per square metre (2 - 3 larvae/plant) in plants with flowers and pods.

Thresholds at all crop stages may be lower for Polish type canola than for Argentine type canola and higher for mustard.

Control

Environmental control
Cool, windy weather reduces adult activity, and females often die before they lay all their eggs. Heavy rainfall can drown small larvae and reduce numbers by more than half. Humid conditions within the crop following a rainfall can promote the spread of fatal fungal diseases throughout the diamondback moth population.

Biological control
Diseases, parasites and predators affect diamondback moths.

Entomophthorales fungi cause natural disease outbreaks in diamondback populations. These outbreaks usually occur late in the growing season when populations are high. The rate of infection of diamondback moth larvae can be high enough to limit the development of additional generations late in the season.

In western Canada, three species of parasitic wasps attack the diamondback moth. Diadegma insulare (Cresson) and Microplitis plutellae (Muesebeck) attack the larval stages while the third species, Diadromus subtilicornis (Gravenhorst), attacks the prepupal and pupal stages.

Diadegma insulare is considered the most important parasitoid. It does not survive prairie winters and migrates northward with the diamondback moth. In Alberta, D. insulare parasitized 45 per cent of diamondback moth individuals in 1992; by comparison, M. plutellae and D. subtilicornis were each responsible for approximately 15 per cent of the parasitism.

Microplitis plutellae has a widespread distribution in North America, overwinters in western Canada and can be present early in the season to parasitize hosts.

Flies, wasps, lacewings, plant bugs, pirate bugs, beetles, spiders and birds also prey on the diamondback moth larvae.

Chemical control
Despite the abundance of potential biological control agents, the only effective way of controlling a diamondback moth outbreak once the population exceeds the economic threshold is to apply an insecticide. After an infestation is controlled at the podding stage, a new infestation is not likely to become established because of the rapid advance of the crop toward maturity.

Insecticide selection will depend on cost, environmental conditions, days to harvest, availability of product, the presence of other pests and the presence of pollinating insects. Consult Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development’s Crop Protection (Blue Book), Agdex 606-1, for up-to-date references to pesticides. Check Alberta Agriculture’s website at: http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/all/agdex32

Always consult the product label for appropriate rates and application guidelines.

Insecticides should always be applied with enough water to ensure adequate coverage. Use high water volumes and label rates when the crop canopy is dense.

Avoiding insecticide application to flowering crops can minimize injury to honeybees and other pollinating insects.

Cultural control
Pre-seed weed control and tillage reduce the availability of cruciferous weeds and volunteer canola host plants, preventing the successful establishment of first generation larvae when moths arrive before canola emergence.

Best Management Practices

  • Early season control of Brassicaceous weeds including volunteer canola helps to eliminate host plants for early arriving diamondback moth.
  • Use the Alberta Insect Pest Monitoring Network to guide crop scouting activities.
  • Scout for early arriving diamondback moth and larvae damage on seedlings.
  • In July and August, monitor crops at least twice per week, scouting for larvae.
  • The nominal threshold when control is required in canola is if larvae exceed 100 to 150 per square metre (1 - 2 larvae/plant) in immature to flowering plants and 200 to 300 per square metre (2 - 3 larvae/plant) in plants with flowers and pods.
  • Minimize the effect on beneficial insects by using economic thresholds to ensure insecticide application is made only when warranted. Anecdotal evidence shows that beneficial insects have kept most diamondback moth infestations below economically damaging levels.
Acknowledgements
Revised by Scott Meers
Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development

With thanks to Lloyd Dosdall, University of Alberta, and Julie Soroka, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, for reviewing the manuscript.

This publication was originally produced as a combined effort of the following agencies:
  • Manitoba Agriculture
  • Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food
  • Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development
  • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
References
Braun, L., O. Olfert, J. Soroka, P. Mason, and L.M. Dosdall. 2004. Diamondback moth biocontrol activities in Canada. Pages 144-146 In: A.A. Kirk, and D. Bordat (eds.): Improving Biocontrol of Plutella xylostella. Proceedings of the International Symposium, 21-24 October 2002, Montpellier, France.

Dosdall, L.M. 1994. Evidence for successful overwintering of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), in Alberta. Can. Entomol. 126:183-185.

Dosdall, L.M., P.G. Mason, O. Olfert, L. Kaminski, and B.A. Keddie. 2004. The origins of infestations of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.), in canola in western Canada. Pages 95-100 In: N.M. Endersby, and P.M. Ridland (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on the Management of Diamondback Moth and Other Crucifer Pests, Melbourne, Australia, 26-29 November 2001.

Dosdall, L.M., R.M. Weiss, O. Olfert, P.G. Mason, and J.J. Soroka. 2008. Diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.), as a pest of canola in Canada: Its historical impact on the crop and predicted effects of climate change on its pest status. Pages 112-121 In: A.M. Shelton, H.L. Collins, Y. Zhang, and Q. Wu (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on the Management of Diamondback Moth and Other Crucifer Pests, Beijing, China, 24-27 October 2006.

Dosdall, Lloyd M., Soroka, Julie J. and Olfert, Owen. 2011 The Diamondback Moth in Canola and Mustard: Current Pest Status and Future Prospects. Prairie Soils and Crops 4:66-76. [http://www.prairiesoilsandcrops.ca]
Gavloski, J.E., and R.J. Lamb. 2000. Compensation for herbivory in cruciferous plants: Specific responses to three defoliating insects. Env. Entomol. 29:1258-67.

Harris, Sask. Agric., Regina, Sask. 1990.

Hopkinson, R.F., and J.J. Soroka. 2010. Air trajectory model applied to an in-depth diagnosis of potential diamondback moth infestations on the Canadian prairies. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 150:1-11.

Justus, K.A., L.M. Dosdall, and B.K. Mitchell. 2000. Oviposition by Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) and effect of phylloplane waxiness. J. Econ. Ent. 93:1152-1159.

Miluch, C.E., L.M. Dosdall, and M.L. Evenden. 2013. The potential for pheromone-based monitoring to predict larval populations of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) in canola (Brassica napus L.). Crop Protection 45: 89-97.

Philip, H., and E. Mengersen. 1989. Insect Pests of the Prairies. University of Alberta Press, Edmonton, AB. 122 pp.

Putnam, L.G. 1978. Diapause and cold hardiness in Microplitis plutellae, a parasite of the larvae of the diamondback moth. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58:911-913.

Sarfraz, M., B.A. Keddie, and L.M. Dosdall. 2005. Biological control of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.): A review. Biocontr. Sci. Technol. 15:763-789.

Sarfraz, M., L.M. Dosdall, and B.A. Keddie. 2010a. Performance of the specialist herbivore Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) on Brassicaceae and non-Brassicaceae species. Can. Entomol. 142:24-35.

Sarfraz, M., L.M. Dosdall, B.A. Keddie, and J. Myers. 2011. Larval survival, host plant preferences and developmental responses of the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) on wild brassicaceous species. Entomol. Sci. 14: 20-30.

Western Committee on Crop Pests. 1995. Minutes of the 34th Annual Meeting, 20-21 October 1995. Victoria, BC, Canada.

More information, contact
Alberta Ag-Info Centre
Call toll free 310-FARM (3276)

Source: Agdex 622-19. Revised January 2014.
 
 
 
 
For more information about the content of this document, contact Duke.
This information published to the web on November 26, 2001.
Last Reviewed/Revised on January 31, 2014.