Evaluation of Two Field Methods to Estimate Soil Organic Matter In Alberta Soils: Appendix 6 - Descriptive Statistics for Results of Active C Methods

 
 
Subscribe to our free E-Newsletter, "Agri-News" (formerly RTW This Week)Agri-News
This Week
  
 
 
 Descriptive statistics for results of active C method based on three repeated measures
Site Name
Site #
Position
Lab OM (%)
Lab LFC (mg/kg)
Active C (mg/kg) 
Active C
Mean
Sample
Variance
Standard
Deviation
Standard
Error
Range
B.H. Prairie
586
M
8.13
2567.92
878.01
854.91
424.66
20.61
11.90
39.60
.
.
.
.
.
848.31
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
838.42
.
.
.
.
.
Manning
588
M
8.02
1576.99
858.21
861.51
32.67
5.72
3.30
9.90
868.11
858.21
Grimshaw
590
M
4.90
2850.83
657.80
690.70
1082.82
32.91
19.00
65.81
.
.
.
.
.
723.61
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
690.70
.
.
.
.
.
Worsley
591
M
12.25
1967.22
896.09
892.88
30.98
5.57
3.21
9.64
.
.
.
.
.
886.45
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
896.09
.
.
.
.
.
High Prairie
592
M
8.92
2411.17
897.81
897.81
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
.
.
.
.
.
897.81
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
897.81
.
.
.
.
.
Fairview
593
M
6.75
883.24
789.42
811.36
842.19
29.02
16.76
54.84
844.27
800.39
B.B. Mtn
594
M
3.76
266.65
481.57
468.71
495.64
22.26
12.85
38.56
.
.
.
.
.
481.57
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
443.01
.
.
.
.
.
Fahler
595
M
8.01
1547.88
741.85
716.14
588.57
24.26
14.01
48.20
.
.
.
.
.
693.65
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
712.93
.
.
.
.
.
Sexsmith
599
M
8.91
1742.30
759.22
831.82
4344.55
65.91
38.05
128.69
.
.
.
.
.
887.91
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
848.31
.
.
.
.
.
Smith
615
M
5.44
5033.70
723.61
749.20
521.36
22.83
13.18
43.87
.
.
.
.
.
756.52
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
767.48
.
.
.
.
.


Site Name

Site #


Position
Lab OM (%)
Lab LFC (mg/kg)
Active C (mg/kg)
Active C
Mean
Sample
Variance
Standard
Deviation
Standard
Error
Range
Boyle
678
M
5.31
4105.46
646.12
652.57
31.20
5.59
3.23
9.68
.
.
.
.
.
655.80
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
655.80
.
.
.
.
.
Bonnyville
680
M
5.60
2734.11
712.64
719.95
1965.12
44.33
25.59
87.75
767.48
679.73
Dapp
681
M
4.11
1949.12
675.15
623.55
2090.63
45.72
26.40
87.08
607.42
588.07
Carvel
684
M
1.54
2055.99
452.65
455.86
1889.61
43.47
25.10
86.76
500.85
414.09
Warspite
687
M
2.44
2835.22
520.35
581.62
4711.71
68.64
39.63
135.45
655.80
568.72
Beauvallon
688
M
9.65
1411.99
866.20
888.14
360.94
19.00
10.97
32.91
899.11
899.11
Tomahawk
692
M
8.02
2565.56
684.01
677.58
123.91
11.13
6.43
19.28
664.73
684.01
Westerose
703
M
2.52
861.77
384.89
371.99
218.42
14.78
8.53
29.03
375.22
355.87
Wetaskiwin
727
M
12.80
720.63
921.05
946.64
521.36
22.83
13.18
43.87
953.95
964.92
Hairy Hill
728
M
9.08
2447.68
876.81
867.17
92.93
9.64
5.57
19.28
867.17
857.53
Killam
738
M
5.20
2222.80
515.20
537.14
360.94
19.00
10.97
32.91
548.11
548.11
Site Name
Site #
Position
Lab OM (%)
Lab LFC (mg/kg)
Active C (mg/kg) 
Active C
Mean
Sample
Variance
Standard
Deviation
Standard
Error
Range
Chauvin
739
M
2.48
492.67
438.42
456.70
280.73
16.76
9.67
32.91
460.36
471.33
Bashaw
740
M
9.30
2637.38
848.31
861.51
228.66
15.12
8.73
29.70
878.01
858.21
Provost
743
M
4.44
271.06
581.02
555.42
761.99
27.60
15.94
54.84
559.08
526.17
Lacombe
744
M
9.15
3214.64
887.91
884.61
32.67
5.72
3.30
9.90
878.01
887.91
Carstairs
746
M
9.96
1242.79
868.11
874.71
32.67
5.72
3.30
9.90
878.01
878.01
Veteran
769
M
4.93
1101.24
492.92
499.30
122.25
11.06
6.38
19.15
492.92
512.07
Three Hills
781
M
6.80
411.83
709.72
696.52
2580.60
50.80
29.33
98.99
739.42
640.43
Hanna
786
M
3.70
2044.03
432.54
465.54
816.64
28.58
16.50
49.50
482.04
482.04
Vulcan
791
M
3.74
326.04
519.83
571.09
1997.36
44.69
25.80
82.02
591.60
601.85
Claresholm
793
M
3.26
190.89
655.09
622.96
2261.34
47.55
27.46
86.76
645.45
568.33
Beiseker
798
M
6.47
594.67
752.55
726.75
592.86
24.35
14.06
48.38
704.18
723.53
Site Name
Site #
Position
Lab OM (%)
Lab LFC (mg/kg)
Active C (mg/kg) 
Active C
Mean
Sample
Variance
Standard
Deviation
Standard
Error
Range
Pincher Creek
800
M
6.09
180.92
809.33
764.34
1889.61
43.47
25.10
86.76
761.13
722.57
Youngstown
804
M
2.60
991.76
345.53
325.02
1997.36
44.69
25.80
71.77
355.78
273.76
Chinook
806
M
2.15
129.09
234.55
237.85
1992.61
44.64
25.77
89.09
284.05
194.96
Oyen
809
M
2.71
460.35
442.44
392.94
2449.93
49.50
28.58
98.99
343.45
392.94
Tilley
812
M
1.43
148.87
326.84
262.34
3494.78
59.12
34.13
116.10
249.44
210.74
Dunmore
815
M
1.91
417.59
335.27
277.17
3188.77
56.47
32.60
112.78
273.76
222.49
Enchant
823
M
2.47
303.13
365.54
394.57
842.49
29.03
16.76
58.05
394.57
423.59
Etzikom-Dry
828a
M
1.49
366.84
407.04
345.53
2943.48
54.25
31.32
102.53
325.02
304.51
Etzikom-Irrig
828b
M
3.10
657.66
413.92
368.77
3026.73
55.02
31.76
106.43
384.89
307.49
  
 
 
 

Other Documents in the Series

  
  Evaluation of Two Field Methods to Estimate Soil Organic Matter In Alberta Soils: Abstract
 Evaluation of Two Field Methods to Estimate Soil Organic Matter In Alberta Soils: Introduction
 Evaluation of Two Field Methods to Estimate Soil Organic Matter In Alberta Soils: Results and Discussion
 Evaluation of Two Field Methods to Estimate Soil Organic Matter In Alberta Soils: Conclusions and References
 Evaluation of Two Field Methods to Estimate Soil Organic Matter In Alberta Soils: Appendix 1 - Methodologies for Field Tests
 Evaluation of Two Field Methods to Estimate Soil Organic Matter In Alberta Soils: Appendix 2 - Lab Procedures for LFC and OM (%)
 Evaluation of Two Field Methods to Estimate Soil Organic Matter In Alberta Soils: Appendix 3 - Tests for Variability in Methodology
 Evaluation of Two Field Methods to Estimate Soil Organic Matter In Alberta Soils: Appendix 4 - Procedure for Active C Test
 Evaluation of Two Field Methods to Estimate Soil Organic Matter In Alberta Soils: Appendix 5 - Procedure for Basic EDTA Test
Evaluation of Two Field Methods to Estimate Soil Organic Matter In Alberta Soils: Appendix 6 - Descriptive Statistics for Results of Active C Methods - Current Document
Evaluation of Two Field Methods to Estimate Soil Organic Matter In Alberta Soils: Appendix 7 - Descriptive Statistics for Results of Basic EDTA Method
  
 
 
 
Share via AddThis.com
For more information about the content of this document, contact Len Kryzanowski.
This document is maintained by Laura Thygesen.
This information published to the web on May 5, 2004.
Last Reviewed/Revised on February 4, 2018.