|
Technical Bulletin: Muskwa | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Muskwa is a general purpose grain barley with good disease and lodging resistance for western Canada.
Muskwa is a six-rowed, smooth-awned, hulled barley, well-adapted to the soil zones of western Canada. It is a semi-dwarf barley with strong straw, smut resistance and intermediate maturity traits equal to or better than Vivar.
Muskwa combines the desirable trait of stable grain yield across western Canada environments with a better than average combination of disease resistance reactions. Muskwa will be useful to include in rotation for scald management. The total resistance package, especially in terms of scald, compensates for a slightly lower yield than checks. The lodging resistance and smooth awns also makes Muskwa an advantageous feed/forage variety.
Strengths
- Grain yields stable across western Canada environments.
- Shorter (semi-dwarf) than both feed and malting checks; good lodging resistance that is better than AC Ranger, CDC Mayfair, and Tradition.
- Percent plumps are similar to Vivar and better than AC Ranger.
- Moderate resistant to scald, spot-form of net blotch and spot blotch; and better than Vivar.
- Good resistance to covered (U. hordei) and false loose smut (U. nigra) similar to Vivar.
- Test weight and 1000K wt equal to Vivar.
- Moderate resistant to stem rust (Rpg1).
Neutral Traits
- Yield is 4% lower than feed checks Vivar and AC Ranger.
- Days to maturity comparable to Vivar.
- Crude protein similar to Vivar.
- Moderate susceptible to common root rot, similar to Vivar.
Weaknesses
- FHB and DON reactions are similar to or worse than Vivar.
- Moderate susceptible to net-form of net blotch; similar to Vivar.
Table 1. Western Co-operative Six-Row Barley Test - Mean summary values for 2009-2010. |
Entry | Heading (days) | Height (cm) | Lodge
(1-9) | Maturity (days) | Yield (kg/ha) | % of Ranger | % of Mayfair | 1000K Wt (g) | Test Wt (g) | % Plumps | % Thin | % Protein | Visual Score |
Muskwa | 60 | 69 | 3 | 95 | 6372 | 96 | 104 | 40 | 62 | 84 | 10 | 11 | 7 |
AC Ranger | 58 † | 76 | 5 | 97 | 6618 | 100 | 108 | 43 | 61 | 79 | 13 | 11 | 6 |
Tradition | 56 | 79 | 4 | 93 | 5876 | 89 | 96 | 39 | 63 | 91 | 6 | 12 | 6 |
Vivar | 59 | 72 | 2 | 96 | 6587 | 100 | 108 | 43 | 62 | 85 | 10 | 11 | 6 |
Lacey | 56 | 76 | 2 | 94 | 5946 | 90 | 97 | 42 | 64 | 92 | 4 | 12 | 6 |
CDC Mayfair | 57 | 77 | 4 | 94 | 6125 | 93 | 100 | 42 | 61 | 92 | 4 | 11 | 7 |
Mean | 57 | 76 | 3 | 94 | 6188 | | | 41 | 62 | 89 | 7 | 11 | 7 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
se | 2 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 630 | | | 3 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 1 |
CV | 3 | 9 | 71 | 3 | 10 | | | 6 | 3 | 7 | --- | 7 | 16 |
sites | 31 | 37 | 9 | 27 | 39 | | | 25 | 22 | 15 | 6 | 6 | 3 |
.
Table 2. Summary of results for 2009 – 2010 Western Co-operative Forage Barley Test. |
Entry | Days to Heading | Hght | Lodg | Rate | Days to Maturity | Grain Yield (kg/ha) | Kwt | Test Wt | % Plump | CP | Forage DM Yld (kg/ha) | Forage Quality |
CP | ADF | NDF | TDN |
Muskwa | 57 | 72 | 1 | 6 | 95 | 5868 | 40 | 63 | 85 | 12 | 8056 | 8 | 32 | 51 | 57 |
Virden | 59 | 90 | 2 | 7 | 97 | 5958 | 45 | 60 | 89 | 12 | 8726 | 8 | 34 | 53 | 54 |
AC Ranger | 57 | 81 | 3 | 6 | 96 | 6089 | 42 | 61 | 80 | 11 | 8172 | 8 | 32 | 52 | 56 |
Vivar | 58 | 75 | 2 | 6 | 97 | 6495 | 44 | 63 | 86 | 11 | 8226 | 8 | 32 | 52 | 57 |
Mean | 57 | 85 | 2 | 7 | 96 | 5471 | 44 | 63 | 86 | 12 | 8436 | 8 | 33 | 52 | 56 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
LSD | 2 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 599 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 911 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
CV | 4 | 12 | 94 | 16 | 2 | 11 | 14 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 12 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 2 |
Stn Yrs | 6 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
.
Table 3. 2010 Average quality parameters from three six-row Coop sites (Calmar, Lacombe and Trochu) as measured by FCDC Lacombe using NIRS. |
Entry | CP | DEC | PD | Lysine | Starch | β-Glucan | Ash | Pentosan | Lipid | TotFiber | SolFiber |
Muskwa | 12 | 2956 | 68 | 0.4 | 57 | 3.9 | 2.5 | 5.2 | 2.1 | 21.6 | 5.0 |
AC Ranger | 12 | 2861 | 75 | 0.4 | 56 | 4.3 | 2.5 | 4.9 | 2.0 | 22.4 | 5.9 |
Tradition | 13 | 3066 | 68 | 0.5 | 58 | 4.4 | 2.0 | 5.1 | 2.5 | 19.9 | 5.0 |
Vivar | 12 | 2987 | 65 | 0.4 | 57 | 4.0 | 2.4 | 5.2 | 2.0 | 21.6 | 4.7 |
Lacey | 13 | 3100 | 72 | 0.5 | 58 | 4.2 | 2.1 | 5.2 | 2.5 | 19.5 | 4.9 |
CDC Mayfair | 12 | 2992 | 72 | 0.4 | 57 | 3.7 | 2.2 | 5.4 | 2.5 | 20.5 | 4.8 |
Mean | 12.3 | 2994 | 70.0 | 0.4 | 57.2 | 4.1 | 2.3 | 5.2 | 2.3 | 20.9 | 5.1 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
sd | 0.5 | 84.4 | 3.6 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 0.4 |
CV | 4.9 | 2.8 | 5.4 | 6.9 | 1.4 | 7.5 | 8.6 | 4 | 7.5 | 4.9 | 9 |
CP = Crude protein; DEC = digestible energy content (Kcal/kg) as fed; PD = Protein digestibility (%);All other parameters: Lysine to SolFiber reported as % of DM |
.
Table 4. 2006-2010 Summary of Grain, Agronomic and Dry matter Yield Data from FCDC Lacombe Trials. |
Variety | Grain Yield Class | | | |
| | 4000 LE Yield LT 6000 | | 6000 LE Yield LT 8000 | | 8000 LE Yield | | All | | Dry Silage |
Yield (kg/ha) | % Check | | Yield (kg/ha) | % Check | | Yield (kg/ha) | % Check | | Yield (kg/ha) | % Check | | Yield (kg/ha) | % Check | | DM Yield (kg/ha) | % Check |
VIVAR | 3486 | 100 | | 5608 | 100 | | 7794 | 100 | | 9809 | 100 | | 7134 | 100 | | 15359 | 100 |
Muskwa | 3278 | 94 | | 5519 | 98 | | 7514 | 96 | | 9482 | 97 | | 6892 | 97 | | 14331 | 93 |
Mean | 3382 | | | 5563 | | | 7654 | | | 9646 | | | 7013 | | | 14845 | |
Sd+ | 147 | | | 63 | | | 198 | | | 231 | | | 171 | | | 727 | |
Stn Yrs | 8 | | | 8 | | | 10 | | | 13 | | | 39 | | | 3 | |
.
Table 5. Summary of results. |
Variety | Grain Yield (kg/ha) | % Check YLD. | Maturity (days) | % Check Maturity | 1000 kwt (KWT) | % Check KWT | Test Wt. (kg/hl) | % Check Testwt | Anthesis (days) | % Check Anthesis | Height (cm) | % Check ht. | Plump (%) | % Check Plump |
VIVAR | 7134 | 100 | 96 | 100 | 43 | 100 | 63 | 100 | 56 | 100 | 77 | 100 | 79.7 | 100 |
Muskwa | 6892 | 97 | 95 | 99 | 41 | 94 | 63 | 101 | 56 | 99 | 75 | 97 | 79 | 99 |
Mean | 7013 | | 96 | | 42 | | 63 | | 56 | | 76 | | 79.4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sd+ | 171 | | 0 | | 2 | | 1 | | 0 | | 1 | | 0.5 | |
Stn Yrs | 39 | | 30 | | 35 | | 35 | | 30 | | 33 | | 28 | |
.
Table 6. Disease Rating for Muskwa – Prairie Recommending Committee for Oat & Barley. |
Disease | Rating |
Surface Borne Smuts | Resistant |
Scald, Spot Blotch, Spot-form Net Blotch | Moderately Resistant |
Stem Rust | Moderately Resistant |
Net-Form Net Blotch | Moderately Susceptible |
Loose Smut, Common Root Rot | Moderately Susceptible |
Speckled Leaf Blotch, Septoria, FHB, Barley Yellow Dwarf Virus | Susceptible |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For more information about the content of this document, contact Erin Collier.
This information published to the web on April 2, 2013.
Last Reviewed/Revised on May 4, 2018.
|
|